‘Fun’ fact: the US company (Kyndryl) blocked from taking over the Dutch digital identity provider (for about 100 million euro) because it was deemed a security risk, still has Defence contracts with the Netherlands in excess of 2 billion euro (project GrIT).

Not better; different. They behave the way the people doing the watching want them to behave. Whether that’s better is purely situational, and that (among others) is why global surveillance is a bad idea.

🎶You can call me AI🎶

Only allowable time to say you use windows.

If you want to sidestep firefox, all firefox descendants would eventually pose the same problem. So I think many options others provided are suboptimal in that regard.

I’m keeping my eyes on ladybird: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird https://ladybird.org/

But it still is in its early stages.

So, a dedicated exploit-button. That’s … convenient?

Right up there with: “Does my pimp love me?”

I don’t think plausible deniability will give you much sway when you’re dealing with the Russian government.

“I am very intelligent.”

I don’t think this image shows her being in a position to backpedal from. I see her providing him with a platform to counter some points that were made elsewhere; she has not necessarily taken a position one way or the other.

Btw also an awesome way of telling people you’re pregnant.

Nope.

Noli equi dentes inspicere donati.

Ah, another pterodactyl aficionado!

“If it’s a legitimate interest, the browser has ways to try to shut that whole thing down”

Not a dig at you btw, but at the people trying to convince us they care about security.

FYI: If you hear someone talking about encrypting passwords (instead of hashing); big red flag that they don’t know what they’re doing.

Cookie bukkake.