They are For-profit

Reminder that FOSS is compatible with commercial licenses.

That is not to say /e/ is FOSS. But given the reality of the capitalist hellscape we live in, we should not shame developers (FOSS or not) for not opting to work for free.

Hell yeah.

damn, I’m so happy that this is the takeaway message people are getting.

withdraw

Parents should be responsible for their kids’ internet usage.

not quite – it’s if you’re using 3.5x more electricity than average. Still seems fucked up from my lemmy-eye view though.

I guess Ty changed their name

deleted by creator

is DropBox not an incumbent anymore?

Then you should say that.

I didn’t say that. I said you did not push the accusation. Instead you weaseled out by saying he was “mentioned.”

You could accuse that “he inspired the Christchurch shooter,” but c’mon just being mentioned by a bad guy isn’t in and of itself a bad thing.

You got a problem with open source? In /c/opensource?

That’s just how war is though. War is always justified by the enemy. I’m not saying it’s sad that they choose to defend themselves – it’s sad that they’re in a situation where they must.

It’s sad to see something made out of love for humanity used for war.

I’m not American. Neither is the CEO. The tweet in question was about American politics.

Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but the thing that bothers you about the CEO is that other people are annoyed by the CEO’s tweet?

Edit: honestly I don’t even understand what’s politically problematic about his tweet. One of the few ways we can encourage the Dems to improve is by voicing our approval on when the GOP actually does something right.

Did the CEO do anything to bother you other than tweet that Slater was a good appointment by Trump? If not, can you explain what the problem is with Slater as a nominee?

Thank you for explaining this. I didn’t know.