I have run my own mail server for 20+ years. I set up everything correctly, including DKIM and DMARC. I have had the same IPs for 10 years. I send <100 emails a month. A few years ago Google started putting most of my emails in spam, and Microsoft started silently deleting them. They will not fix it. I had to start paying for a relay for outgoing messages.

Use migadu.com.

Please provide any input or alternative options on this,

The post asked for alternative options. I suggested an alternative option. It is not knee-jerk, and it is not noise.

Alternative: make a separate “selfhosted-ai” community for the sloperators.

Working at home: mpd + ncmpc on my personal laptop.

At the office: mpd + malp on my phone.

No streaming. I buy CDs and vinyl and rip them and download live recordings, and only listen to entire albums or concerts.

ssh -L 1234:localhost:1234 remote_server binds the RPi’s localhost:1234 to remote_server’s localhost:1234. You want to bind the port to something on the RPi that the TV can hit, so something like ssh -L 192.168.1.5:1234:localhost:1234 remote_server, where 192.168.1.5 is the RPi’s address.

I think you also want -N on the ssh command.

Can you provide more detail? What are the networks/routers/vlans? Which network is the RPi on? What is your ssh command? Is that ufw command on the RPi or the router?

Github is like the Microsoft of 3rd party forges.

“self hosting is important because …”

Uses github.

mailfence.com ?

If you run your own mail server and set up everything correctly, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, most major providers will still either silently drop your messages or always mark them as spam, unless you pay money for a relay (e.g.: postmarkapp.com).

I have had my domain for 20 years and IP for years, and set up everything correctly, and Microsoft and Google rarely accepted my messages.

While his perceptions of other people’s motives and meanings may be suspect, his technical analysis seems pretty spot on.

Are you sure L2 is 192.168.1.0/24 and not something larger that includes 192.168.30.0, e.g.: 192.168.0.0/16?

What does ip route show before and after connecting to WG?

Are you testing DNS via dig @<nameserver>? or just with ping? Are you running systemd-resolved?

No LLM use is benign. The effects on the environment, the internet, and society are real, and that cannot be ignored.

You can make the argument that in some cases it is justified, e.g.: for scientific research.

No.

If your home IP does not change often, you can use a dynamic DNS service. But your services will be unavailable from the time that your IP changes and the time the DNS record is updated and the cached responses expire.

Servers are all Debian. Family member’s laptops are all Debian. I used Debian on laptops for 20 years, but when Steam Deck switched to Arch, I switched my laptop to Arch to force me to learn it. I have a file with notes of differences between Debian and Arch. Next time I buy a new laptop, I will probably go back to Debian.

Agreed, very suspicious. I would feel safe assuming that I can use the code under AGPL, but I would hesitate to use it for anything other than personal hobby because it would not surprise me if they closed their github account and never released any more code.

IANAL. I originally interpreted the license.txt as: all of the source code is AGPL (see lines 234-235), some of the source is also Apache 2.0, and the binaries are MIT; plus a trademark notice and contact info for getting a commercial license. After rereading it, my only conclusion is that this is a dumpster fire of a license.txt, and can be reasonably read several different ways.

At the copyright owner, they are within their rights to release the source code under the AGPL, and also sell it under other licenses. Anyone is free to use the code under the AGPL. Nobody who releases code under an open-source license is obligated to provide binaries.

As the copyright owner, they are free to use the code along with other non-open-source code (e.g.: SSO integrations) to build a non-free product.

Mattermost is licensed under the AGPL. How are they enforcing a 250 user limit?

Edit: the commercial version with additional features (e.g.: SSO) is limited. Obviously the open-source version is unlimited.