• 1 Post
  • 14 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 27th, 2026

help-circle


  • I recall a while back Ecobee was blocking Home Assistant users, apparently by locking down api access.

    A quick search tells me that they now have an official integration and are good with Home Assistant again.

    That is truly good news! I had previously written this company off for being hostile to self-hosters but apparently have cleared their name.



  • I agree and I’ve always tried to keep WiFi IoT devices to an absolute minimum. I have a couple dozen ZigBee devices that have been rock solid, and if my count is right I have 6 on the WiFi IoT network.

    • Lay-Z-Spa smart control built on an Esp32
    • A vintage fan that I replaced the internals including an Esp32 for remote control
    • Two WLED Esp32 controllers
    • A Govee controller
    • And now the Nest

    This feels like a reasonable number, and being mostly based on reliable Esp32 boards helps. With that said, I would absolutely urge anyone adding smart home equipment to look into ZigBee, ZWave, Thread or some combination.

    My Zigbee devices have been reliable and have very low latency which is really important for things like lights / switches.




  • quadrant5835@lemmy.zipOPtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Nest Thermostat in 2026
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Great question and the answer is a combination of things. First, I got an absolute great deal on it, just $25 shipped. Second, I knew the hardware itself was really high quality. And lastly, I don’t have a zwave radio in my home (this far) and looking at the ZigBee thermostats seemed like a bit of a minefield. I do mention in the blog post that I was considering a Zen ZigBee thermostat and then when I found the super cheap Nest decided it was worth a try even if I later replace it.

    Nice luck on the A/C upgrade! I’ll never I understand why a house this modern skipped out on running a 5+ wire cable.






  • I’m in the US and my ISP gives everyone CGNAT by default. On the lower tier plans, we have the option to buy a semi-static IP for an extra fee. The higher tier plans include the semi-static IP for free upon request.

    I have also been talking with them about IPv6. They will only grant customers a /64 prefix because their pool of v6 addresses is so small, they would run out of their allocation if they granted customers a /60.

    By only giving customers a single /64 I cannot implement v6 on my VLANs. This is incredibly frustrating considering v6 has like so many addresses it’s not even like a number most people know. Like a trillion trillion or whatever. And you’re telling me I can only have one (subnet)?